Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, Annie.-
dc.contributor.authorYap, Jocelyn Shu Mei.-
dc.description.abstractThree studies were conducted in Singapore to explore the applicability and reliability of online administration of the Picture Story Exercise (PSE), a revised version of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) (McClelland, Koestner, & Weinberger, 1989). Special attention was paid to picture profiles generated under three different samples and two testing conditions. Specifically, we provided data on test-retest reliability of online administration, activity inhibition scores, gender and sample differences between students and working adults. Results show that online administration is a potential alternative in assessment of implicit motives as picture profiles under different samples and test-retest reliability were comparable to previous studies (Pang & Schultheiss, 2005; Schultheiss & Brunstein, 2001). Additionally, there was no gender difference in n Affiliation for all samples.en_US
dc.format.extent46 p.en_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University-
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Psychologyen_US
dc.titleBig three motives : validation and reliability of online PSE in Singapore.en_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorJoyce Pang Shu Minen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Artsen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
500.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

Updated on Feb 27, 2021


Updated on Feb 27, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.