Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/47023
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJiao, Yipengen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-27T05:55:29Z
dc.date.available2011-12-27T05:55:29Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/47023
dc.description55 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this project, two different methods, covariance matrix analysis and surface wave analysis, are implemented to find out the direction of seismic surface motion (footsteps or hammer strikes). These two methods are compared by this study and it's found that the surface wave analysis is much better than the covariance matrix analysis.en_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological Universityen_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Electrical and electronic engineering::Electronic systems::Signal processingen_US
dc.titleDiscussion on the bearing estimation of seismic signalsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorAndy Khong Wai Hoongen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (Signal Processing)en_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:EEE Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EEE_THESES_74.pdf
  Restricted Access
5.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

232
Updated on Nov 28, 2020

Download(s) 5

6
Updated on Nov 28, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.