Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/57691
Title: | Cash flow statement : the direct vs indirect controversy | Authors: | Ang, Tiong Ling Tan, Mui Li Tay, Swee Wah |
Keywords: | DRNTU::Business::Accounting::Cash flow | Issue Date: | 1997 | Abstract: | SAS 7 (Revised), titled 'Cash Flow Statement", was introduced in Singapore in August 1994. This is in line with the trend in the US and other countries where cash flow statement has been adopted in favour of funds statement. Before the promulgation of cash flow statement in these countries, there was a heated debate on the choice of method (direct vs. indirect) to be used to prepare cash flow statement. Subsequently, many countries recommended the direct method in their standards. Despite the recommendation, most of the preparers adopted the indirect method in practice. In light of this controversial situation, our project seeks to find out the attitudes towards the cash flow reporting format from the perspectives of both the preparers and users of cash flow statement in Singapore. | Description: | 133 p. | URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/10356/57691 | Schools: | Nanyang Business School | Rights: | Nanyang Technological University | Fulltext Permission: | restricted | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | NBS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI) |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
NBS FYP 1997_23.pdf Restricted Access | 13.94 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s) 20
734
Updated on May 7, 2025
Download(s)
8
Updated on May 7, 2025
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.