Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/59005
Title: Survey on software architecture design approaches and tools
Authors: Rekha Kemburaju
Keywords: DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Software::Software engineering
Issue Date: 2014
Abstract: Software architecture provides a powerful way to manage the complexity of large software systems. Software architecture can help people to better understand the total structure of the system. It has emerged as a distinct form of abstraction for software systems with its own set of design issues, vocabulary, and rules. In order to describe these architectures many methods have been invented. These are called Architecture description languages (ADLs) [1]. ADL is a formal language used to describe the structure and behaviour of software architecture. It provides features for modelling a software system’s conceptual architecture, distinguished from the system’s implementation. This paper studies different ADL languages: Wright# , Acme, xADL 2.0, Aesop and its associated tools Process Analysis Toolkit (PAT), AcmeStudio, ArchStudio, and AesopSystem using an ADL comparison framework and an architecture-style evaluation framework. The ADL comparison framework looks into architecture modelling features and tool support offered by these selected ADLs. This comparison framework intends to highlight the general capabilities and qualities of ADLs. The evaluation framework is complimentary to this general survey of ADLs. It evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of selected ADLs for their support to model the Client-server and Pipe-and-filter architecture styles.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10356/59005
Rights: Nanyang Technological University
Fulltext Permission: restricted
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SCSE Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rekha_FinalYearReport.pdf
  Restricted Access
3.49 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 50

159
checked on Oct 23, 2020

Download(s) 50

12
checked on Oct 23, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.