Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/59278
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChoo, Gladis Hui Li
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-29T02:24:17Z
dc.date.available2014-04-29T02:24:17Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/59278
dc.description.abstractSince Descartes' cogito ergo sum takes the self-reflexive "I" as the guarantor of its existence and the basis of all things, it may be considered an anthropocentric philosophy. As a critique of the anthropocentrism that underpins Descartes' philosophy, Heidegger's conception of the aesthetic interpellates itself within an anti-humanist tradition that locates the human within a universe which pre-exists it, thereby revealing the limitations of the Cartesian mode of seeking after empirical knowledge. These limitations surface most obviously in the observation of the world's resistance to our attempts to subjugate it under totalising concepts, rendering itself infinitely strange and ungraspable to the inquiring Cartesian subject. The sheer indifference of nature to the human world should further debunk the view that takes the human as the world's ontological centre. Given the decentred condition of the human, which renders the notion of human volition tenuous, Heidegger's non-anthropocentric conception of the aesthetic offers a possibility of transcending this tedium. This possibility is evinced in Heideggerean poiesis, which refers to a bringing forth, by which the artist may realise his volition, however fleetingly, as an interdependent achievement vis-à-vis the autonomous art object that he leads to being. The realisation of this volition is contingent upon the artist's understanding of his ontological standpoint as what Heidegger calls "Being-in-the-world", a standpoint which recognises his situatedness in the world, that his being is always defined vis-à-vis the world itself. Given that much of John Banville's oeurve feature the decentred subject as suspended in an indifferent world, this paper seeks to trace the assimilation of this non-anthropocentric aesthetic specifically in the art trilogy, even as the novels foreground differing sets of meditations on the imagination and the significance of art.en_US
dc.format.extent35 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University
dc.subjectDRNTU::Humanitiesen_US
dc.titleNon-anthropocentric poetics in John Banville's art trilogyen_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorCornelius Anthony Murphyen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Artsen_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FYP final draft.docx
  Restricted Access
FYP final draft177.1 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open

Page view(s)

381
Updated on Jul 24, 2024

Download(s) 50

25
Updated on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.