Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Does what we say influence what we think? Examining the effect of language across three domains : colour, number, space-and-time||Authors:||Tee, Shee Hui
Ooi, Zhi Heng
Wah, Claris Rou Lin
|Keywords:||DRNTU::Social sciences::Psychology||Issue Date:||2014||Abstract:||Linguistic determinism, a key feature of the Whorfian Hypothesis, proposes that the language we speak will influence our cognition. This happens when language biases us to use concepts that are coded in language over those that are not (weak form), or when language determines our cognition (strong form). Hence, this paper aims to determine the extent of linguistic influence on cognition across three domains: colour, number, space-and-time, using evidence from three main perspectives: infant studies, experiments on non-linguistic tasks, neurological data. In the domain of colour, pre-linguistic infants are shown to have colour categorical perception. They become better at perceiving colours that are consistent with language-specific colour boundaries. Neurological data further support this finding by demonstrating lateralization effects consistent with the involvement of language in adults. In the domain of number, pre-linguistic infants have been shown to perform approximation tasks when the difference between two values is large. Adult speakers of language with limited quantification vocabularies performed worse than those with larger number vocabularies on tasks that require exact quantity concept. Neurological evidence further confirmed this finding: approximation is language-independent, while exact quantity is language-dependent. In the domain of space-and-time, pre-linguistic infants can use both allocentric and egocentric coding systems. However, language acquisition is shown to influence speakers to adopt one predominant strategy. Neurological data shed light on the possible link between language and cognition too, albeit more studies are required to confirm this relationship. Taken together, these findings show that language does influence our cognition to different extents.||URI:||http://hdl.handle.net/10356/59873||Rights:||Nanyang Technological University||Fulltext Permission:||restricted||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.