Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/63300
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xiao
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-12T05:05:27Z
dc.date.available2015-05-12T05:05:27Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationLi, X. (2015). Do investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgements. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/63300
dc.description.abstractIdentifying the determinants of analysts’ credibility (composed of competence and trustworthiness) is an important issue because it affects both analysts’ career prospects and investors’ investment choice making. In a bold forecast setting, I experimentally examine whether and how an analyst characteristic, reputation, and two forecast features, forecast accuracy and bold valence (i.e., whether the bold forecast is positively bold or negatively bold relative to the consensus forecast), jointly influence the two dimensions of analyst credibility. I find that, in the absence of accuracy information, investors trust analysts more when they make a negatively (as opposed to positively) bold forecast, with the effect evident only for lower reputation analysts. Upon revelation of accuracy information, lower (as compared to higher) reputation analysts who issue a negatively bold forecast gain more competence increases when the forecast is accurate, and do not suffer greater competence losses when the forecast is inaccurate. For the trustworthiness dimension, although lower reputation analysts do not experience greater trustworthiness increases than higher reputation analysts for a negatively bold and accurate forecast, their post-accuracy trustworthiness is advanced to a level comparable to that of a higher reputation analyst. Overall, my study contributes to the literature by introducing a new forecast attribute, bold valence. In addition, I am the first to show that the two dimensions of analyst credibility, competence and trustworthiness, are differentially influenced by different analyst and forecast attributes. My study also has implications for analysts by identifying ways they can build credibility with investors.en_US
dc.format.extent73 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Business::Accountingen_US
dc.titleDo investors differentiate the dimensions of an analyst's credibility? An examination of bold valence, reputation and accuracy on investors’ competence and trustworthiness judgementsen_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.supervisorTan Hun Tongen_US
dc.contributor.schoolCollege of Business (Nanyang Business School)en_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (NBS)en_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:NBS Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Thesis 20150508_Li Xiao.pdf
  Restricted Access
Main paper968.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.