Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/64227
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWirawan, Wilson
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-25T06:55:29Z
dc.date.available2015-05-25T06:55:29Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/64227
dc.description.abstractIn the past, ports are merely seen as an interface between land and sea for the carriage of cargoes. However, as the importance of trade and prominence of globalization grows, the role of ports had evolved from the former definition to one that is a focal point in the world supply chain. Existing port’s performance literature are mainly focused on productivity criteria or indicators that includes faster cargo movement or vessel turnaround time. However, there is a lack of literature on the aspect on sustainable port management, in specific, the role of energy in driving ports’ performance and reputation and how ports can in turn exert influence in its control on energy production and consumption. In order to meet increasing expectations on the Port of Singapore’s performance by stakeholders, this report focused on the 6 requisite pillars of sustainable energy. The 6 sustainable energy pillars are 1) Energy Mix 2) Energy Efficiency 3) Energy Security 4) Energy Ethics 5) Energy Governance 6) Energy Partnership. The rationale for these 6 pillars in context to port’s sustainable development are detailed via the latter literature review done with 25 identified relevant sustainable energy criteria.Each of the 25 criteria are grouped accordingly to its matching pillars. This report establish a framework of relevant criteria that need to be prioritized by conducting an analysis of these criteria using a survey population with port-related background. These 25 criteria are subsequently categorized into a framework of Main Criteria and Secondary Criteria based on their perceived importance following the analysis of the survey results. Some of the Main and Secondary Criteria are subsequently assessed to shed more information on why they are prioritized for the development of the Port of Singapore. The framework is later used as a foundation for the formulation of a Hexagon Model assessment sheet to evaluate other ports around the world.en_US
dc.format.extent50 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineeringen_US
dc.titleFramework of key success criteria for high performance and sustainable ports (energy perspective)en_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorKang Kok Hinen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Science (Maritime Studies)en_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:CEE Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FYP_Wilson Wirawan_U1120839J_19.04.2015.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

443
Updated on Apr 20, 2025

Download(s)

26
Updated on Apr 20, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.