Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/64852
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAndreas Bakke Froystadvag
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-08T15:09:40Z
dc.date.available2015-06-08T15:09:40Z
dc.date.copyright2014en_US
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/64852
dc.description.abstractThe increased presence of overseas investment activities by sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) over the last few decades has put them under high levels of scrutiny by recipient countries' governments. Suspicions that SWFs may carry political agendas have led to stringent reviews of national security implications of their investments, often based on flexible legislations with broad space for legal interpretations. The China Investment Corporation (CIC), established in 2007 to increase the returns on China's official foreign exchange reserves, has attempted to raise the transparency of its investment motives through adherence to best practices known as the Santiago Principles. Despite such efforts, and little evidence of any politically motivated investment behavior, CIC executives have claimed that national security reviews in developed countries have been employed more frequently in times when those countries have been under low economic stress. Such statements signal politicization of the investment review processes in developed countries, where political opinion, rather than genuine national security concerns, have affected whether foreign investments are accepted or rejected. This study analyzes the changing investment climates for CIC in the U.S., the UK, and France. It assesses legislative flexibilities, public opinions, and macroeconomic conditions in the three polities in order to find if the investment review process of each is susceptible to politicization and if such susceptibility has changed in line with macroeconomic variations. The study finds that the U.S. investment review process is susceptible to politicization and that such politicization has likely taken place following the recovery from the global financial crisis, resulting in a worsened investment climate for CIC. The investment review processes in the UK and France have not been susceptible to politicization. Moreover, negative macroeconomic conditions for the two countries following the eruption of the Eurozone crisis have resulted in an improved investment climate for CIC, although brought about by the proactive stance of governments and companies rather than by any de-politicization.en_US
dc.format.extent56 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Business::International businessen_US
dc.titleChina investment corporation's forays into Europe and the United States : explaining the different receptionsen_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.supervisorFriedrich Wun-Yuen Wuen_US
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (International Political Economy)en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ANDREAS_BAKKE_FROYSTADVAG_2014.pdf
  Restricted Access
7.04 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 20

158
Updated on Feb 27, 2021

Download(s)

7
Updated on Feb 27, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.