Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/65853
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Yao
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-31T01:24:32Z
dc.date.available2015-12-31T01:24:32Z
dc.date.copyright2015en_US
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationYu, Y. (2015). Conservative reporting, measurement similarity, and financial information comparability. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/65853
dc.description.abstractThis thesis examines whether the use of conservative versus aggressive accounting estimates (i.e., conservative/aggressive reporting) affects investors’ perception of financial information comparability (i.e., perceived comparability), and whether this effect is moderated by the extent to which firms use the same or different accounting measurements to record similar transactions (i.e. measurement similarity). Experiment 1 shows that conservative (as opposed to aggressive) reporting increases perceived comparability, and that this effect is significant only when firms use the same accounting measurement, not when firms use different accounting measurements. Experiment 2 finds a boundary condition for the results in Experiment 1; namely, a contrast between the conservatism/aggressiveness engaged in the firms’ reporting practices must be present so that investors can identify the different degrees of conservatism/aggressiveness in each firm’s reporting; otherwise, the effect of conservative/aggressive reporting on perceived comparability would disappear, including the moderating effect of measurement similarity. This thesis also examines investors’ investment decisions. Results from both experiments seem to indicate that investment decision is affected by two factors—perceived comparability and conservative/aggressive reporting. Specifically, perceived comparability increases investment in that more comparable information makes a firm’s superior financial performance more convincing. Meanwhile, conservative (as opposed to aggressive) reporting reduces investment probably because unsophisticated investors only take the “face value” of conservative reporting, instead of thinking that the underlying firm value should be higher than what is reported. Finally, this thesis finds that perceived comparability enhances investors’ confidence about their investment decisions and that this result is robust in both experiments.en_US
dc.format.extent78 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Business::Accountingen_US
dc.titleConservative reporting, measurement similarity, and financial information comparabilityen_US
dc.typeThesis
dc.contributor.supervisorTan Hun Tongen_US
dc.contributor.schoolNanyang Business Schoolen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (NBS)en_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:NBS Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dissertation_Yao Yu_26Dec2015.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.34 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 50

431
Updated on Jul 23, 2024

Download(s) 50

25
Updated on Jul 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.