Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/6669
Title: Progress tracking : PMS or office suite?
Authors: Kuan, Shee Kin.
Keywords: DRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Construction management
Issue Date: 2000
Abstract: The objective of this dissertation is to compare the Progress Tracking functions for Construction Management using the Microsoft Projects and the Microsoft Office Suites. The Microsoft Project is designed specifically for Project Management and has all the built-in functions to produce the necessary charts and reports. However, due to the complexities of Construction Projects, the Progress Tracking using time-based method has its limitations and could not fulfill the actual need of the Construction Manager. The more practical approach to Progress Tracking in Construction Projects would be using the quantity-cost based report. The Tracking function is done by using the weightage factor of each activity, based on quantity and unit cost. This would enable the Project Manager to know the actual amount of work that has been done and the amount of work that would be needed to be done in quantity and cost.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10356/6669
Research Centres: Centre for Advanced Construction Studies 
Rights: Nanyang Technological University
Fulltext Permission: restricted
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:CACS Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CACS_THESES_51.pdf
  Restricted Access
10.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 50

523
Updated on May 7, 2025

Download(s)

6
Updated on May 7, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.