Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLim, Mee Mee-
dc.description.abstractThere has been an increasing concern on progressive collapse of buildings with the increase in risks due to dangers from terrorist attacks. There are two most popular methods adopted in current building codes to mitigate such threats, namely indirect method and direct method. One of the direct methods is alternate load path (ALP) method. ALP is the more effective approach to study the structural resistance to progressive collapse. Hence, the ALP method is often used with column removal assumption to assess the occurrence of progressive collapse. There have been many studies done on the ALP of reinforced concrete structures using static procedures to examine structural resistance to progressive collapse. However, progressive collapse is a dynamic and non-linear event. Hence, to fully understand the realistic response of RC structures under progressive collapse, this project will focus on the study of dynamic response of RC sub-structures. Free-fall dynamic and contact detonation tests are the two dynamic tests which are proposed. For this project, it will only be focusing on the free-fall dynamic series. The main purpose of the tests is to compare structural behavior under quasi-static and dynamic conditions. The specimens are tested under different parameters such as the load level, boundary conditions, axial force in columns and the difference between point-loading and distributed-loading methods.en_US
dc.format.extent79 p.en_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University-
dc.titleProgressive collapse resistance of reinforced concrete structuresen_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorTan Kang Haien_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Engineering (Civil)en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:CEE Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FYP Report 2016 Final Draft.pdf
  Restricted Access
9.13 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

Updated on Jul 27, 2021

Download(s) 50

Updated on Jul 27, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.