Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTeo, Annabella Wen Ting
dc.description.abstractLanguage ideologies have become an important topic of study in linguistics, where previous research has focused on the relationship between ideologies and politics, gender, social class and the power of ideologies itself. In Singapore, studies have been done on a broad scale ranging from ideologies on language learning, family planning, and language policy criticism and revision. This study aims to fill the research gap of language ideology studies of Singlish in the public sphere through the analysis of The Straits Times forum letters. 148 letters were analysed, applying a framework from Bokhorst-Heng’s (2005) work on the Singlish debate. The analysis indicated that five ideologies mentioned by Bokhorst-Heng were visible in the forum letter data in this study. These included ideologies related to ‘intelligibility’, ‘economic/practical functions’, ‘proper English’, ‘identity and unity’ and ‘dichotomy’. In addition, the results of the present study also suggested that three other ideologies were also evidenced in the letter data, which were labelled as ‘reputational damage’, ‘diglossia’ and ‘morality’. Of all the arguments, ‘Proper English’ was found to be the most frequently-made argument against Singlish, and the arguments of ‘intelligibility’, ‘economic/’practical functions’ and ‘proper English’ were frequently clustered together in making a case against Singlish, illustrating overt issues using the Singlish debate as a front for discourse. The five ideologies from Bokhorst-Heng were found to have decreased in saliency after 2009 while the other three ideologies increased, suggesting a shift in language ideologies surround Singlish possibly explained by changes in Singaporeans’ needs in a globalized world.en_US
dc.format.extent39 p.en_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University
dc.titleIdeologies of ‘Singlish’ in the forum letters of The Straits Times from 1979 to 2017en_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorKingsley Boltonen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Artsen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Teo Wen Ting Annabella_Ideologies of Singlish in TST forum letters_LMS FYP 2016.pdf
  Restricted Access
Main FYP document1.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.