Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLim, Tracy Cyne Jeat
dc.description.abstractIn most deep braced excavation analyses, for convenience, half of the excavation cross section is modelled and analysed with the assumption of symmetrical geometry and horizontal soil stratigraphy across the excavation site. However, in reality, the actual ground conditions at the excavation site are not uniform, but may vary across the section. The focus of this project is to conduct back analysis using the finite element program PLAXIS 2D to study the importance of carrying out full excavation finite element analysis by incorporating the actual excavation conditions, which include the variation in soil stratigraphy across the excavation and the difference in wall depths for asymmetrical deep braced excavation. Case study on the collapse of cut and cover tunnel excavation adjacent to the Nicoll Highway was considered due to the comprehensive nature of data. To consider asymmetrical excavation geometry, full excavation analysis involving two walls was carried out. In addition, half mesh analysis of north and south wall with the assumption of symmetrical excavation geometry and horizontal soil layers were also conducted to have a comparison with the full excavation analysis. Half mesh analyses adopting method A and C were carried out and the results showed that method A is an unsafe method of computation as the design undrained shear strength of clay is being underestimated. Lateral wall displacements, wall bending moments and strut loads were obtained from each analysis to highlight the differences between method A and C, north and south wall, lastly the half and full mesh analysis. The findings show that it is important to fully incorporate the actual excavation conditions at the excavation site in a finite element analysis as the full excavation analysis considering the actual excavation conditions obtained larger lateral wall displacements, wall bending moments and strut loads. To provide a comparison, even when the most conservative soil profile was adopted, the convenient half excavation method is inadequate in obtaining actual behaviours of the wall and soil at both sides of the excavation. Hence, when the soil layers are inclined and the soil stratigraphy at both walls is distinctively different, full excavation analysis should be carried out instead.en_US
dc.format.extent77 p.en_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Civil engineering::Geotechnicalen_US
dc.titleFinite element analysis of asymmetric deep braced excavationen_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorTeh Cee Ingen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Engineering (Civil)en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:CEE Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Final Report FYP.pdf
  Restricted Access
5.1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

Updated on Jul 24, 2024

Download(s) 50

Updated on Jul 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.