Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGan, Damian Zheing Weii
dc.description.abstractAre some electoral systems more competent at environmental protection than others? This study proposes and empirically tests causal linkages between the electoral systems, economic performances, and levels of environmental degradation of developing democracies. Two sets of time-series cross-sectional multivariate regression analyses (i.e., econometric and environmental degradations) were conducted using a sample of 40 developing democracies, from the time period of 1995-2015. The findings suggest that majoritarian systems have more dynamic economic performances compared to proportional representation (PR) systems. Furthermore, majoritarian systems emitted significantly more carbon dioxide and produced worse Environmental Performance Index scores. I argue that the higher levels of environmental degradation of majoritarian systems relative to PR systems can be partially attributed to their more robust economic activities. At the same time, majoritarian systems produced surprisingly lower levels of sulfur dioxide pollution compared to PR systems. I show that there is sufficient evidence to challenge the conventional wisdom that PR systems are systematically better at offering environmental protection.en_US
dc.format.extent59 p.en_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Political scienceen_US
dc.titleDemocratic electoral systems and the environment of the developing worlden_US
dc.contributor.supervisorWu Fengshien_US
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (International Political Economy)en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
  Restricted Access
6.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s)

Updated on Apr 10, 2021

Download(s) 50

Updated on Apr 10, 2021

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.