Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/74372
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTeo, Jun Yean-
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-16T13:26:21Z-
dc.date.available2018-05-16T13:26:21Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/74372-
dc.description.abstractTo drive economic growth, many governments today, especially in Asia, are attempting to develop their own entrepreneurship ecosystems (EEs), with 2 notable ones being Singapore and Hong Kong. Interestingly, both have developed their EEs using different approaches, top-down and bottom-up respectively. The purpose of this paper is to explore how these approaches impact differently on an EE’s outcomes, a topic which has been relatively under-explored in the literature. The paper adopted a multiple case study methodology, using mainly “progress reports” to assess empirically the influence of government approaches on the outcomes in Singapore and Hong Kong’s EEs, delineated in 2 different domains. The results showed that the top-down approach leads to greater coordination within the EE, though it remains ambiguous if this necessarily leads to better outcomes for the EE. This research revealed alternative trends that have not been exposed in prior research, thereby challenging dominant assumptions in the field.en_US
dc.format.extent54 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological University-
dc.subjectDRNTU::Businessen_US
dc.titleA tale of two entrepreneurial cities : exploring ecosystem-building approaches in Singapore and Hong Kongen_US
dc.typeFinal Year Project (FYP)en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorWoo Jun Jieen_US
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Humanities and Social Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Artsen_US
item.grantfulltextrestricted-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:HSS Student Reports (FYP/IA/PA/PI)
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FYP Paper v2.pdf
  Restricted Access
2.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Page view(s) 20

658
Updated on Jul 22, 2024

Download(s) 50

31
Updated on Jul 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.