Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/75940
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Vanessaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-10T07:59:02Z
dc.date.available2018-08-10T07:59:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationBarros, V. (2018). Intercultural conflict : a multi-method study of conflict, trust repair, and conflict resolution. Doctoral thesis, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10356/75940
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation has three purposes. The first purpose is to clarify the concept of conflict in order to reconcile inconsistent definitions of conflict in the literature. The second purpose is to go beyond the current focus on broad conflict-management styles by examining the specific moves that senior executives use to manage intercultural conflicts. The third purpose is to cross-validate findings from a senior executive sample with a student sample. I first use a scientometric analysis to review conflict management literature. Then, I adopt a multi-method approach for the two subsequent studies. In the first study, I interview senior executives (n = 40) about their responses to 160 intercultural conflict episodes. I analyze these interviews following procedures adapted from grounded theory to develop a taxonomy of intercultural conflict management moves. I then adopt, in the second study, a quantitative method to cross-validate my findings with a sample of 41 students (i.e., an additional 164 intercultural conflict episodes). Through this research, I first propose a working definition of intercultural conflict. Second, I discover 10 intercultural conflict-management moves among senior executives’ responses, some of which have not yet been identified in previous literature. Last, findings from the cross-validation study highlight the greater sophistication of senior executives’ intercultural conflict-management moves compared with students’. In particular, senior executives tend to elaborate more than students across all intercultural conflict-management moves. I discuss the implications of these findings for future research and practice.en_US
dc.format.extent192 p.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNanyang Technological Universityen_US
dc.subjectDRNTU::Business::Management::Conflict managementen_US
dc.titleIntercultural conflict : a multi-method study of conflict, trust repair, and conflict resolutionen_US
dc.typeThesis-Doctor of Philosophyen_US
dc.contributor.supervisorAng Soonen_US
dc.contributor.schoolNanyang Business Schoolen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (NBS)en_US
dc.contributor.researchCentre for Leadership and Cultural Intelligenceen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.32657/10356/75940-
dc.contributor.supervisoremailASANG@ntu.edu.sgen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:NBS Theses
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Dissertation Revised Version 100718 fv.pdf2.3 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s) 10

834
Updated on Jul 18, 2024

Download(s) 50

81
Updated on Jul 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.