Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/79410
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChou, Mabel C.en
dc.contributor.authorChua, Geoffrey Angen
dc.contributor.authorTeo, Chung-Piawen
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-18T08:18:40Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T13:24:38Z-
dc.date.available2015-05-18T08:18:40Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T13:24:38Z-
dc.date.copyright2010en
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifier.citationChou, M. C., Chua, G. A., & Teo, C.-P. (2010). On range and response : dimensions of process flexibility. European journal of operational research, 207(2), 711-724.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/79410-
dc.description.abstractThere are two dimensions to process flexibility: range versus response. Range is the extent to which a system can adapt, while response is the rate at which the system can adapt. Although both dimensions are important, the existing literature does not analytically examine the response dimension vis-a-vis the range dimension. In this paper, we model the response dimension in terms of uniformity of production cost. We distinguish between primary and secondary production where the latter is more expensive. We examine how the range and response dimension interact to affect the performance of the process flexible structure. We provide analytical lower bounds to show that under all scenarios on response flexibility, moderate form of range flexibility (via chaining structure) still manages to accrue non-negligible benefits vis-a-vis the fully flexible structure (the bound is 29.29% when demand is normally distributed). We show further that given limited resources, upgrading system response dimension outperforms upgrading system range dimension in most cases. This confirms what most managers believe in intuitively. We observe also that improving system response can provide even more benefits when coupled with initiatives to reduce demand variability. This is in direct contrast with range flexibility, which is more valuable when the system has higher variability.en
dc.format.extent25 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean journal of operational researchen
dc.rights© 2010 Elsevier. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.038].en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Business::Operations managementen
dc.titleOn range and response : dimensions of process flexibilityen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolNanyang Business Schoolen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.038en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:NBS Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Chou, Chua, & Teo (2010) On range and response.pdf665.84 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

32
Updated on Jul 20, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 10

24
Updated on Oct 28, 2023

Page view(s) 50

524
Updated on Jul 20, 2024

Download(s) 10

391
Updated on Jul 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.