Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Sustainability and Asia||Authors:||van Dongen, Els
|Issue Date:||2015||Source:||van Dongen, E., & Liu, H. (2015). Sustainability and Asia. Nature and Culture, 10(1), 1-11. doi:10.3167/nc.2015.100101||Series/Report no.:||Nature and Culture||Abstract:||What is the added value of investigating the contested concept of “sustainability” in tandem with the geographical marker of “Asia” in today’s world? To answer this question, we need to return to the formulation of the problematique of “sustainability” and “sustainable development” several decades ago. The Our Common Future report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED)—also known as the Brundtland Commission—put forward the most commonly recognized and most frequently used definition of “sustainable development” (SD) in 1987.1 Development could be made sustainable, so the report stated, “to ensure that it meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (WCED 1987: 15). The report further proclaimed that there were limits to development, but that improvements in technology and social development could “make way for a new era of economic growth” (ibid.).||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80649
|ISSN:||1558-6073||DOI:||http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100101||Rights:||This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedited version of an article published inNature and Culture. The definitive publisher-authenticated version van Dongen, E., & Liu, H. (2015). Sustainability and Asia. Nature and Culture, 10(1), 1-11 is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100101||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SoH Journal Articles|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.