Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/80678
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKang, Shao-Boen
dc.contributor.authorTan, Kang Haien
dc.contributor.authorYang, En-Huaen
dc.contributor.authorNg, Kian Weeen
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-25T07:16:55Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T13:54:33Z-
dc.date.available2016-05-25T07:16:55Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T13:54:33Z-
dc.date.copyright2015en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.identifier.citationKang, S.-B., Tan, K. H., Yang, E.-H., & Ng, K. W. (2015). Structural behaviour of precast beam-column sub-assemblages with cast-In-situ engineered cementitious composites under column removal scenarios. 5thInternational Conference on Design and Analysis of Protective Structures (DAPS2015), 1-9.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/80678-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an experimental study on the structural behaviour of precast beam-column sub-assemblages under column removal scenarios, in which conventional concrete and engineered cementitious composites (ECC) were used in the cast-in-situ concrete topping and the beam-column joint. The specimens were restrained by horizontal and vertical load cells and tested under quasi-static loading condition. Experimental results indicate that at the initial stage ECC and steel reinforcement sustained tensile stresses compatibly and multiple cracking was observed in the ECC topping. When the tensile strain capacity of ECC was exhausted, major cracks were formed in the plastic hinge region, whereas at other sections ECC remained intact to transfer tensile stresses across cracks. Compared to conventional concrete, ECC resulted in more severe localisation of rotations in a limited region due to its tension-stiffening behaviour. Conclusions are drawn that application of ECC to structural topping and beam-column joints did not significantly enhance structural resistance of sub-assemblages under column removal scenarios. However, the calculated pseudo-static resistance of ECC sub-assemblage is greater than that of concrete specimen due to better energy-absorption capacity of ECC.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights© 2015 The Author(s). This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by International Conference on Design and Analysis of Protective Structures (DAPS), The Author(s). It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://www.cma.sg/events/5th-international-conference-on-design-and-analysis-of-protective-structures-daps2015.html].en
dc.subjectColumn removal scenariosen
dc.subjectBeam-column sub-assemblagesen
dc.subjectEngineered cementitious compositesen
dc.subjectCompressive arch actionen
dc.subjectCatenary actionen
dc.titleStructural Behaviour of Precast Beam-Column Sub-Assemblages with Cast-In-Situ Engineered Cementitious Composites under Column Removal Scenariosen
dc.typeConference Paperen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen
dc.contributor.conferenceInternational Conference on Design and Analysis of Protective Structures (DAPS) (5th:2015:Singapore)en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.cma.sg/events/5th-international-conference-on-design-and-analysis-of-protective-structures-daps2015.htmlen
dc.identifier.rims186329en
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:CEE Conference Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Structural Behaviour of Precast Beam-Column Sub-assemblages with Cast-In-Situ ECC.pdf813.08 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s) 50

480
Updated on Jun 3, 2023

Download(s) 20

172
Updated on Jun 3, 2023

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.