Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81347
Title: Pedantic Semantics or Strategic Discourse? The Politics of Talking about Terrorism
Authors: Sumpter, Cameron
Keywords: Country and Region Studies
Conflict and Stability
Southeast Asia and ASEAN
Terrorism Studies
Issue Date: 2016
Source: Sumpter, C. (2016). Pedantic Semantics or Strategic Discourse? The Politics of Talking about Terrorism. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 150). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.
Series/Report no.: RSIS Commentaries, 150-16
Abstract: The language chosen by leaders to discuss terrorism and extremism has the power to shape and (de)legitimise particular strategic responses. Politically incorrect discourse will only lead to politically incorrect decisions.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81347
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40779
Rights: Nanyang Technological University
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:RSIS Commentaries and Reports

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CO16150.pdf339.11 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s) 50

400
Updated on Dec 9, 2022

Download(s) 20

241
Updated on Dec 9, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.