Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSumpter, Cameronen
dc.identifier.citationSumpter, C. (2016). Pedantic Semantics or Strategic Discourse? The Politics of Talking about Terrorism. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 150). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.en
dc.description.abstractThe language chosen by leaders to discuss terrorism and extremism has the power to shape and (de)legitimise particular strategic responses. Politically incorrect discourse will only lead to politically incorrect decisions.en
dc.format.extent3 p.en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRSIS Commentaries, 150-16en
dc.rightsNanyang Technological Universityen
dc.subjectCountry and Region Studiesen
dc.subjectConflict and Stabilityen
dc.subjectSoutheast Asia and ASEANen
dc.subjectTerrorism Studiesen
dc.titlePedantic Semantics or Strategic Discourse? The Politics of Talking about Terrorismen
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Commentaries and Reports
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CO16150.pdf339.11 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Page view(s) 50

Updated on Mar 21, 2023

Download(s) 20

Updated on Mar 21, 2023

Google ScholarTM


Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.