Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81347
Title: | Pedantic Semantics or Strategic Discourse? The Politics of Talking about Terrorism | Authors: | Sumpter, Cameron | Keywords: | Country and Region Studies Conflict and Stability Southeast Asia and ASEAN Terrorism Studies |
Issue Date: | 2016 | Source: | Sumpter, C. (2016). Pedantic Semantics or Strategic Discourse? The Politics of Talking about Terrorism. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 150). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University. | Series/Report no.: | RSIS Commentaries, 150-16 | Abstract: | The language chosen by leaders to discuss terrorism and extremism has the power to shape and (de)legitimise particular strategic responses. Politically incorrect discourse will only lead to politically incorrect decisions. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81347 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40779 |
Schools: | S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies | Rights: | Nanyang Technological University | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | RSIS Commentaries and Reports |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CO16150.pdf | 339.11 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Page view(s) 50
467
Updated on Mar 17, 2024
Download(s) 20
257
Updated on Mar 17, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.