Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81474
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSwaminathan, Ramabadranen
dc.contributor.authorKaragiannidis, George K.en
dc.contributor.authorRoy, Rajarshien
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-13T04:08:16Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T14:31:49Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-13T04:08:16Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T14:31:49Z-
dc.date.copyright2016en
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationSwaminathan, R., Karagiannidis, G. K., & Roy, R. (2016). Joint antenna and relay selection strategies for decode-and-forward relay networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 65(11), 9041-9056.en
dc.identifier.issn0018-9545en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/81474-
dc.description.abstractCooperative diversity systems with optimal and suboptimal antenna and relay selection have been paid significant attention for more than half a decade. However, optimal antenna and relay selection strategies require global channel state information (CSI), which is a cumbersome process. In this paper, we propose a diversity-optimal and three suboptimal transmit-receive antenna and relay selection strategies, named S1, S2, and S3, for decode-and-forward cooperative relaying systems, equipped with Nt and Nr antennas at the source (S) and the destination (D), respectively, and considering a multirelay scenario. Furthermore, we study the symbol error probability (SEP) for these strategies, assuming M-ary phase-shift keying signaling over Rayleigh fading channels. In addition, we perform diversity order analysis through closed-form asymptotic SEP expressions. Since the proposed suboptimal strategies, i.e., S2 and S3, involve the socalled switch-and-examine combining scheme, we compare the complexity of S1, S2, and S3 in terms of the average number of CSI required at D to select the best transmit-receive antenna pair and relay. From the derived SEP expressions, it can be concluded that all three suboptimal strategies achieve the same diversity order of NtNr + N, where N is the number of relays, except for the case when the switching threshold signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is much lower than the average SNR in S2 and S3. Finally, the diversity-optimal strategy achieves full diversity order of NtNr + N min(Nt, Nr).en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technologyen
dc.rights© 2016 IEEEen
dc.subjectAntenna and relay selection strategiesen
dc.subjectDecode-and-forward (DF)en
dc.titleJoint antenna and relay selection strategies for decode-and-forward relay networksen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Computer Science and Engineeringen
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/TVT.2016.2515265en
dc.identifier.rims192023en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:SCSE Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

11
Updated on Sep 13, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 20

8
Updated on Oct 24, 2023

Page view(s)

390
Updated on Sep 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.