Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81489
Title: Extending the evaluation of Genia Event task toward knowledge base construction and comparison to Gene Regulation Ontology task
Authors: Kim, Jin-Dong
Kim, Jung-jae
Han, Xu
Rebholz-Schuhmann, Dietrich
Keywords: text mining
knowledge base
semantic web
resource description framework
shared task
evaluation
bionlp
information extraction
Issue Date: 2015
Source: Kim, J.-D., Kim, J.-J., Han, X., & Rebholz-Schuhmann, D. (2015). Extending the evaluation of Genia Event task toward knowledge base construction and comparison to Gene Regulation Ontology task. BMC Bioinformatics, 16(Suppl 10), S3-.
Series/Report no.: BMC Bioinformatics
Abstract: Background: The third edition of the BioNLP Shared Task was held with the grand theme "knowledge base construction (KB)". The Genia Event (GE) task was re-designed and implemented in light of this theme. For its final report, the participating systems were evaluated from a perspective of annotation. To further explore the grand theme, we extended the evaluation from a perspective of KB construction. Also, the Gene Regulation Ontology (GRO) task was newly introduced in the third edition. The final evaluation of the participating systems resulted in relatively low performance. The reason was attributed to the large size and complex semantic representation of the ontology. To investigate potential benefits of resource exchange between the presumably similar tasks, we measured the overlap between the datasets of the two tasks, and tested whether the dataset for one task can be used to enhance performance on the other. Results: We report an extended evaluation on all the participating systems in the GE task, incoporating a KB perspective. For the evaluation, the final submission of each participant was converted to RDF statements, and evaluated using 8 queries that were formulated in SPARQL. The results suggest that the evaluation may be concluded differently between the two different perspectives, annotation vs. KB. We also provide a comparison of the GE and GRO tasks by converting their datasets into each other's format. More than 90% of the GE data could be converted into the GRO task format, while only half of the GRO data could be mapped to the GE task format. The imbalance in conversion indicates that the GRO is a comprehensive extension of the GE task ontology. We further used the converted GRO data as additional training data for the GE task, which helped improve GE task participant system performance. However, the converted GE data did not help GRO task participants, due to overfitting and the ontology gap.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81489
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/40825
ISSN: 1471-2105
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-16-S10-S3
Schools: School of Computer Science and Engineering 
Rights: © 2015 Kim et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SCSE Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

17
Updated on Jun 11, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 20

8
Updated on Oct 27, 2023

Page view(s) 50

439
Updated on Jun 18, 2024

Download(s) 50

148
Updated on Jun 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.