Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/81831
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSam, Emma Yoke Looen
dc.contributor.authorHo, Moon-Ho Ringoen
dc.contributor.authorUy, Marilyn Angen
dc.contributor.authorChenyshenko, Oleksandr S.en
dc.contributor.authorChan, Kim Yinen
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-22T04:33:58Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T14:41:06Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-22T04:33:58Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T14:41:06Z-
dc.date.copyright2014-07-01en
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationChan, K. Y., Sam, E. Y. L., Ho, M.-H. R., Uy, M. A., & Chenyshenko, O. S. (2014). Attitudinal versus psychosocial resource measures of career adaptability and boundaryless career attitudes. 28th International Congress of Applied Psychology.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/81831-
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines the factor structure and relationships between two self-report measures of career adaptability: the revised Career Maturity Inventory “Adaptability” form (rCMI-A Savickas & Porfeli, 2011) – an attitudinal measure of career adaptability, and, the Career Adapt-Abilities Scale (CAAS; Savickas & Porfeli, 2012) which conceptualizes career adaptability as a set of psychosocial resources. Confirmatory factor analyses of data collected from 750 university students in Singapore show that the two career adaptability scales are each best modeled in terms of a second-order “general” factor and several first-order factors; and, that the second-order factors correlate .43, suggesting that they measure two different but related constructs. All three (concern, curiosity and confidence) subscales of the attitudinal rCMI-A correlate most strongly with the “concern” subscale of the CAAS rather than with the corresponding sub-scale, suggesting that career adaptability as measured in the attitudinal, rCMI-A is a narrower construct than that measured in the overall CAAS. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses also show that attitudinal career adaptability does not add the prediction of boundaryless career attitudes over career adaptability resources. We conclude that the CAAS measures a broader construct of career adaptability than the rCMI A, and that it is more strongly related to “new economy”, boundaryless career attitudes, and thus a better measure for operationalizing career construction theory.en
dc.format.extent17 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.rights© 2014 The Authors.en
dc.subjectCareer maturityen
dc.subjectCareer adaptabilityen
dc.titleAttitudinal versus psychosocial resource measures of career adaptability and boundaryless career attitudesen
dc.typeConference Paperen
dc.contributor.schoolCollege of Business (Nanyang Business School)en
dc.contributor.conference28th International Congress of Applied Psychology (ICAP)en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.identifier.rims182665en
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:NBS Conference Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ICAP2014_CMI-CAI_paper_with_authors_FINAL v1.1.pdf431.99 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s) 20

492
Updated on Oct 18, 2021

Download(s) 20

167
Updated on Oct 18, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.