Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82129
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBateman, Samen
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-17T08:56:11Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T14:47:15Z-
dc.date.available2016-08-17T08:56:11Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T14:47:15Z-
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.citationBateman, S. (2016). After South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundaries. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 199). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/82129-
dc.description.abstractThe 12 July 2016 arbitral tribunal ruling in The Hague has specified that there are no islands in the Spratly group capable of generating a full set of maritime zones. This has theoretically helped agreement on maritime boundaries in the South China Sea but many problems still remain.en
dc.format.extent3 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRSIS Commentaries, 199-16en
dc.rightsNanyang Technological Universityen
dc.subjectConflict and Stabilityen
dc.subjectEast Asia and Asia Pacificen
dc.titleAfter South China Sea Ruling – Good Fences or Good Neighbours: Implications for Maritime Boundariesen
dc.typeCommentaryen
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Commentaries and Reports
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CO16199.pdf338.09 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s) 50

427
Updated on Jul 23, 2024

Download(s) 50

131
Updated on Jul 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.