Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82731
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTakeshita, Nobuyoshien
dc.contributor.authorPhee, Soo Jayen
dc.contributor.authorChiu, Philip Waiyanen
dc.contributor.authorHo, Khek Yuen
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-02T06:42:38Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T15:04:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-02T06:42:38Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T15:04:21Z-
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.citationTakeshita, N., Phee, S. J., Chiu, P. W., & Ho, K. Y. (2018). Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills in endoscopy (GEARS-E) : objective assessment tool for master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot. Endoscopy International Open, 6(8), E1065-E1069. doi:10.1055/a-0640-3123en
dc.identifier.issn2364-3722en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/82731-
dc.description.abstractBackground and study aims: The Master and Slave Transluminal Endoscopic Robot (MASTER) is a novel robotic endosurgical system with two operating arms that offer multiple degrees of freedom. We developed a new assessment tool, the Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills in Endoscopy (GEARS-E), derived from existing tools in laparoscopic and robotic surgery, and evaluated its utility in the performance of procedures using MASTER. Methods: This was a pilot study conducted in vivo and ex vivo on animals. Three operators (Novice-1, Novice-2 and Expert) performed a total of five endoscopic submucosal dissections (ESD) using MASTER. Novice operators had no MASTER experience and the expert had previously performed eight MASTER ESDs. Operator performance was assessed by four independent evaluators using GEARS-E, which has a maximum score of 25 for five domains representing various skill-related variables (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling and autonomy). Results: The mean global rating scores for Novice-1 first attempt, Novice-1 second attempt, Novice-2 first attempt, Novice-2 second attempt and Expertʼs cases were 13.0, 16.0, 13.3, 15.5, and 21.5, respectively. The mean scores of each of the five domains were statistically higher for the second attempts compared to the first attempts for both Novice-1 and Novice-2. The mean scores of each of the five domains for the Expertʼs case were consistently higher than those for the two novice operators in both their first and second attempts. Conclusion: Results using GEARS-E showed correlations between surgical experience and MASTER ESD. As an assessment tool for evaluation of surgical skills, GEARS-E has great potential for application in MASTER procedures.en
dc.format.extent5 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEndoscopy International Openen
dc.rights© 2018 The Author(s) (published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.en
dc.subjectEngineering::Mechanical engineeringen
dc.subjectRobotic Skillsen
dc.subjectEndoscopyen
dc.titleGlobal evaluative assessment of robotic skills in endoscopy (GEARS-E) : objective assessment tool for master and slave transluminal endoscopic roboten
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen
dc.identifier.doi10.1055/a-0640-3123en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:MAE Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
global evaluative.pdf681.23 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.