Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82820
Title: Evaluating a threefold intervention framework for assisting researchers in literature review and manuscript preparatory tasks
Authors: Sesagiri Raamkumar, Aravind
Foo, Schubert
Pang, Natalie
Keywords: Literature review
Digital library
Issue Date: 2017
Source: Sesagiri Raamkumar, A., Foo, S., & Pang, N. (2017). Evaluating a threefold intervention framework for assisting researchers in literature review and manuscript preparatory tasks. Journal of Documentation, 73(3), 555-580.
Series/Report no.: Journal of Documentation
Abstract: Purpose: Systems to support literature review (LR) and manuscript preparation tend to focus on only one or two of the tasks involved. The purpose of this paper is to describe an intervention framework that redesigns a particular set of tasks, allowing for interconnectivity between the tasks and providing appropriate user interface display features for each task in a prototype system. Design/methodology/approach: A user evaluation study was conducted on the prototype system. The system supports the three tasks: building a reading list (RL) of research papers, finding similar papers based on a set of papers and shortlisting papers from the final RL for inclusion in manuscript based on article type. A total of 119 researchers who had experience in authoring research papers, participated in the evaluation study. They had to select one of the provided 43 topics and execute the tasks offered by the system. Three questionnaires were provided for evaluating the tasks and system. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed on the collected evaluation data. Findings: Task redesign aspects had a positive impact in user evaluation for the second task of finding similar papers while improvement was found to be required for the first and third tasks. The tasks interconnectivity features seed basket and RL were helpful for the participants in conveniently searching for papers within the system. Two of the four proposed informational display features, namely, information cue labels and shared co-relations were the most preferred features of the system. Student user group found the task recommendations and the overall system to be more useful and effective than the staff group. Originality/value: This study validates the importance of interconnected task design and novel informational display features in accentuating task-based recommendations for LR and manuscript preparatory tasks. The potential for improvement in recommendations was shown through the task redesign exercise where new requirements for the tasks were identified. The resultant prototype system helps in bridging the gap between novices and experts in terms of LR skills.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/82820
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/42315
ISSN: 0022-0418
DOI: 10.1108/JD-06-2016-0072
Rights: © 2017 Emerald Publishing Limited. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Documentation, Emerald Publishing Limited. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2016-0072].
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:WKWSCI Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JD-2016-for archiving.pdfMain article1.28 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

1
Updated on Jan 22, 2021

Page view(s) 50

336
Updated on Jan 26, 2021

Download(s) 20

146
Updated on Jan 26, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.