Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/83442
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorComodi, Gabrieleen
dc.contributor.authorCarducci, Francescoen
dc.contributor.authorSze, Jia Yinen
dc.contributor.authorBalamurugan, Nagarajanen
dc.contributor.authorRomagnoli, Alessandroen
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-06T06:28:15Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T15:23:03Z-
dc.date.available2017-06-06T06:28:15Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T15:23:03Z-
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationComodi, G., Carducci, F., Sze, J. Y., Balamurugan, N., & Romagnoli, A. (2017). Storing energy for cooling demand management in tropical climates: A techno-economic comparison between different energy storage technologies. Energy, 121, 676-694.en
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/83442-
dc.description.abstractThis paper addresses the role of energy storage in cooling applications. Cold energy storage technologies addressed are: Li-Ion batteries (Li-Ion EES), sensible heat thermal energy storage (SHTES); phase change material (PCM TES), compressed air energy storage (CAES) and liquid air energy storage (LAES). Batteries and CAES are electrical storage systems which run the cooling systems; SHTES and PCM TES are thermal storage systems which directly store cold energy; LAES is assessed as a hybrid storage system which provides both electricity (for cooling) and cold energy. A hybrid quantitative-qualitative comparison is presented. Quantitative comparison was investigated for different sizes of daily cooling energy demand and three different tariff scenarios. A techno-economic analysis was performed to show the suitability of the different storage systems at different scales. Three parameters were used (Pay-back period, Savings-per-energy-unit and levelized-cost-of-energy) to analyze and compare the different scenarios. The qualitative analysis was based on five comparison criteria (Complexity, Technology Readiness Level, Sustainability, Flexibility and Safety). Results showed the importance of weighing the pros and cons of each technology to select a suitable cold energy storage system. Techno-economic analysis highlighted the fundamental role of tariff scenario: a greater difference between peak and off-peak electricity tariff leads to a shorter payback period of each technology.en
dc.format.extent68 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergyen
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Energy, Elsevier Ltd. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.038].en
dc.subjectLiquid air energy storage (LAES)en
dc.subjectCold thermal energy storageen
dc.titleStoring energy for cooling demand management in tropical climates: A techno-economic comparison between different energy storage technologiesen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.038en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:MAE Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Storing energy for cooling demand management in tropical climates.pdf809.4 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

56
Updated on Sep 2, 2024

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 10

47
Updated on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

631
Updated on Sep 7, 2024

Download(s) 5

594
Updated on Sep 7, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.