Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84434
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYin, Keen
dc.contributor.authorDou, Xiaominen
dc.contributor.authorRen, Feien
dc.contributor.authorChan, Wei-Pingen
dc.contributor.authorChang, Victor Wei-Chungen
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-08T08:30:55Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T15:45:09Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-08T08:30:55Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T15:45:09Z-
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationYin, K., Dou, X., Ren, F., Chan, W.-P., & Chang, V. W.-C. (2018). Statistical comparison of leaching behavior of incineration bottom ash using seawater and deionized water : significant findings based on several leaching methods. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 344, 635-648. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.004en
dc.identifier.issn0304-3894en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/84434-
dc.description.abstractBottom ashes generated from municipal solid waste incineration have gained increasing popularity as alternative construction materials, however, they contains elevated heavy metals posing a challenge for its free usage. Different leaching methods are developed to quantify leaching potential of incineration bottom ashes meanwhile guide its environmentally friendly application. Yet, there are diverse IBA applications while the in situ environment is always complicated, challenging its legislation. In this study, leaching tests were conveyed using batch and column leaching methods with seawater as opposed to deionized water, to unveil the metal leaching potential of IBA subjected to salty environment, which is commonly encountered when using IBA in land reclamation yet not well understood. Statistical analysis for different leaching methods suggested disparate performance between seawater and deionized water primarily ascribed to ionic strength. Impacts of leachant are metal-specific dependent on leaching methods and have a function of intrinsic characteristics of incineration bottom ashes. Leaching performances were further compared on additional perspectives, e.g. leaching approach and liquid to solid ratio, indicating sophisticated leaching potentials dominated by combined geochemistry. It is necessary to develop application-oriented leaching methods with corresponding leaching criteria to preclude discriminations between different applications, e.g., terrestrial applications vs. land reclamation.en
dc.format.extent36 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Hazardous Materialsen
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. This paper was published in Journal of Hazardous Materials and is made available with permission of Elsevier B.V.en
dc.subjectSeawateren
dc.subjectLeaching Methodsen
dc.subjectEngineering::Environmental engineeringen
dc.titleStatistical comparison of leaching behavior of incineration bottom ash using seawater and deionized water : significant findings based on several leaching methodsen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.researchNanyang Environment and Water Research Instituteen
dc.contributor.researchResidues and Resource Reclamation Centreen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.11.004en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:NEWRI Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

17
Updated on Mar 5, 2021

PublonsTM
Citations 10

16
Updated on Mar 8, 2021

Page view(s)

83
Updated on Apr 15, 2021

Download(s) 50

35
Updated on Apr 15, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.