Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84812
Title: | A comparative evaluation of differently synthesized high surface area carbons for Li-ion hybrid electrochemical supercapacitor application: Pore size distribution holds the key | Authors: | Suryawanshi, Anil Biswal, Mandakini Mhamane, Dattakumar Yadav, Prasad Banerjee, Abhik Yadav, Poonam Patil, Shankar Aravindan, Vanchiappan Madhavi, Srinivasan Ogale, Satishchandra |
Keywords: | Porous carbon Li-ion capacitor |
Issue Date: | 2015 | Source: | Suryawanshi, A., Biswal, M., Mhamane, D., Yadav, P., Banerjee, A., Yadav, P., et al. (2016). A comparative evaluation of differently synthesized high surface area carbons for Li-ion hybrid electrochemical supercapacitor application: Pore size distribution holds the key. Applied Materials Today, 2, 1-6. | Series/Report no.: | Applied Materials Today | Abstract: | We report a comparative evaluation of carbonaceous cathodes synthesized by different protocols in the context of Li-ion hybrid electrochemical supercapacitors (Li-HEC) application. The four cathode materials compared include hierarchically perforated graphene (HPGN), Polymer (Poly (4-styrene sulfonic acid-co-maleic acid) sodium salt) derived Graphene (PDG), dead Neem leaves derived carbon (LDC) and commercial activated carbon (CAC). All these carbons exhibit high specific surface area with excellent porosity. In the single electrode configuration (vs. Li), HPGN shows maximum specific capacitance of ∼155 F g−1 with good cycleability over 1000 cycles (99.5% retention). On the other hand, there is no obvious distinctive difference between the specific capacitance values for the rest of the carbonaceous materials tested. The Li-HEC is constructed with spinel phase Li4Ti5O12 anode and carbonaceous materials described above as cathode in a non-aqueous medium. Amongst the various cases the Li-HEC with HPGN delivered maximum energy and corresponding power density of 65 Wh kg–1 and 0.5 kW kg−1, respectively with excellent cycleability as compared to the rest of the materials, tested in the same configuration under the same testing conditions. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/84812 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41980 |
ISSN: | 2352-9407 | DOI: | 10.1016/j.apmt.2015.11.002 | Schools: | School of Materials Science & Engineering | Research Centres: | Energy Research Institute @ NTU (ERI@N) | Rights: | © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Applied Materials Today, Elsevier Ltd. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2015.11.002]. | Fulltext Permission: | open | Fulltext Availability: | With Fulltext |
Appears in Collections: | ERI@N Journal Articles MSE Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
A comparative evaluation of differently synthesized high surface area carbons.pdf | 1.42 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
SCOPUSTM
Citations
20
17
Updated on Mar 21, 2024
Web of ScienceTM
Citations
20
17
Updated on Oct 29, 2023
Page view(s) 50
569
Updated on Mar 28, 2024
Download(s) 20
263
Updated on Mar 28, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.