Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Audience Prototypes and Asymmetric Efficacy Beliefs
Authors: Rosenthal, Sonny
Keywords: Third-person effect
Internet use
Issue Date: 2016
Source: Rosenthal, S. (2016). Audience Prototypes and Asymmetric Efficacy Beliefs. Journal of Media Psychology, in press.
Series/Report no.: Journal of Media Psychology
Abstract: Prior research suggests that the third-person effect is related to media schemas, for example, that general audiences are vulnerable to influence. The current study evaluates whether the effect of media schemas depends on more specific audience schemas. Participants read descriptions of four “actors” in a 2 (gullible vs critical-minded) × 2 (heavy vs light Internet users) repeated measures experiment and rated how much the actors can resist the influence of media and how much they benefit from censorship. For comparison, participants rated themselves on the same dependent variables. Results show that gullible heavy Internet users are perceived to have the greatest self-regulatory inefficacy and benefit the most from censorship, while the outcome is opposite for critical-minded light Internet users. These patterns remains when evaluating self-other asymmetric efficacy beliefs, which the discussion situates in relation to motivational and cognitive processes underlying the third-person effect.
ISSN: 1864-1105
DOI: 10.1027/1864-1105/a000193
Rights: © 2016 Hogrefe Publishing. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Media Psychology, Hogrefe Publishing. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [].
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:WKWSCI Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Audience Prototypes and Asymmetric Efficacy Beliefs.pdf178.57 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Page view(s) 50

checked on Oct 21, 2020

Download(s) 50

checked on Oct 21, 2020

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.