Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85301
Title: “A little is better than zero” or “pay enough or don’t pay at all”? evidence on the size of pay-for-performance across the sectors
Authors: Chen, Chung-An
Keywords: Performance Pay
Pay Size
Social sciences::General
Issue Date: 2018
Source: Chen, C.-A. (2018). “A Little Is Better Than Zero” or “Pay Enough or Don’t Pay at All”? Evidence on the Size of Pay-for-Performance Across the Sectors. Public Personnel Management, 47(2), 119-143. doi:10.1177/0091026017747298
Series/Report no.: Public Personnel Management
Abstract: Regarding the effect of pay-for-performance (PFP), standard economic reasoning suggests that “a little is better than zero,” meaning that even small performance payments can improve employees’ work morale. An alternative view, “pay enough or don’t pay at all,” suggests that paying too little may instead erode employees’ work morale. Using the U.S. General Social Survey (GSS) data, the present study finds evidence that the two views actually complement each other: Small payments can improve employees’ work effort (e.g., working hours), but can also potentially compromise their work attitudes (e.g., job satisfaction). In addition, employees in different working sectors may have different understanding of what “small size” really means. Findings are followed by theoretical and practical implications.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/85301
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/49196
ISSN: 0091-0260
DOI: 10.1177/0091026017747298
Rights: © 2017 The Author(s). All rights reserved.
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SSS Journal Articles

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.