Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Influence of backwashing on the pore size of hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes
Authors: Akhondi, Ebrahim
Zamani, Farhad
Law, Adrian Wing-Keung
Krantz, William Bernard
Fane, Anthony Gordon
Chew, Jia Wei
Keywords: Membrane fouling
Issue Date: 2016
Source: Akhondi, E., Zamani, F., Law, A. W.-K., Krantz, W. B., Fane, A. G., & Chew, J. W. (2017). Influence of backwashing on the pore size of hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 521, 33-42.
Journal: Journal of Membrane Science 
Series/Report no.: Journal of Membrane Science
Abstract: Backwashing is a common method for fouling mitigation. However, its impact on the pore-size distribution (PSD) of hollow fiber (HF) membranes has not been studied to date. This study quantitatively assessed the effects of filtration and backwashing cycles on the PSDs of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) HF membranes by evapoporometry (EP) characterization. The membranes were characterized before and after repeated cycles of filtration and backwashing in the absence of any foulants, and for a feed solution of bentonite and humic acid that caused fouling both on and within the membrane pores. Firstly, in the absence of any foulants, backwashing caused the appearance of larger pores, the effect of which was greater for the rubbery PVDF membrane than for the glassy PAN membrane. Secondly, backwashing was more effective in removing the fouling within the larger pores, but could not remove all the deposits within the smaller pores, which provides a mechanistic explanation for the progressive increase in the transmembrane pressure (TMP) with each backwashing cycle. Thirdly, the membranes that did not undergo the 10th backwashing at the end of 10 cycles of filtration and backwashing displayed a marked shift of the PSD towards smaller pores due to the deposition of foulants on and within the largest pores, whereas those that underwent the 10 complete backwashing cycles achieved nearly complete recovery of the larger pores accompanied by an irreversible increase in the diameter of the largest pores. Fourthly, a higher backwashing flux led to similar average pore diameters of the fouled and virgin membranes due to the increased effectiveness in restoring the smallest pores, but the corresponding higher filtration flux negated the benefits due to a greater fouling extent particularly for the larger pores. Finally, in order to achieve the desired permeation and rejection properties, possible enlargement of the pores needs to be taken into consideration when choosing a ultrafiltration (UF) membrane and when specifying the backwashing intensity and protocol.
ISSN: 0376-7388
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2016.08.070
Rights: © 2016 Elsevier
Fulltext Permission: none
Fulltext Availability: No Fulltext
Appears in Collections:CEE Journal Articles
NEWRI Journal Articles
SCBE Journal Articles


Updated on Sep 4, 2020


Updated on Feb 23, 2021

Page view(s)

Updated on Mar 1, 2021

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.