Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Separating efficiency and equality, automation, and piketty's theory of increasing capital share||Authors:||Ng, Yew-Kwang||Keywords:||DRNTU::Social sciences::Economic development
|Issue Date:||2016||Source:||Ng, Y. K. (2016). Separating efficiency and equality, automation, and piketty's theory of increasing capital share. Contemporary Economic Policy, 34(3), 396-398. doi:10.1111/coep.12182||Series/Report no.:||Contemporary Economic Policy||Abstract:||Despite disincentive effects, it is more efficient to tackle inequality by general equality promotion policies, including tax/transfers, than by trying to pursue equality in specific issues or policies. The latter policy also has the same degree of disincentive effects as the general policy but has additional distortive effects. While Piketty' concern with inequality is well taken and his proposal to reduce inequality has merits, his argument on the inevitability of increasing capital share under capitalism and the condition of rate of returns to capital being larger than the rate of growth in incomes (r > g) is not correct. (JEL D3, D6, H).||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/87329
|ISSN:||1074-3529||DOI:||10.1111/coep.12182||Rights:||© 2016 Western Economic Association International||Fulltext Permission:||none||Fulltext Availability:||No Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SSS Journal Articles|
Updated on Mar 4, 2021
Updated on Jun 25, 2022
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.