Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/87593
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRotman, Jeff D.en
dc.contributor.authorKhamitov, Mansuren
dc.contributor.authorConnors, Scotten
dc.contributor.editorCampbell, Margaret C.en
dc.contributor.editorWinterich, Karen Pageen
dc.contributor.editorSen, Sankaren
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-17T02:32:05Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T16:45:14Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-17T02:32:05Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T16:45:14Z-
dc.date.issued2018en
dc.identifier.citationRotman, J. D., Khamitov, M.,& Connors, S. (2018). Lie, Cheat, and Steal: How Harmful Brands Motivate Consumers to Act Unethically. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 353-361.en
dc.identifier.issn1057-7408en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/87593-
dc.description.abstractWhile brand punishment—through either individual or collective action—has received ample attention by consumer psychologists, absent from this literature is that such punishment can take the form of unethical actions that can occur even when the consumer is not personally harmed. Across three studies, we examine consumers’ propensity to act unethically towards a brand that they perceive to be harmful. We document that when consumers come to see brands as harmful—even in the absence of a direct, personal transgression—they can be motivated to seek retribution in the form of unethical intentions and behaviors. That is, consumers are more likely to lie, cheat, or steal to punish a harmful brand. Drawing on these findings, we advance implications for consumer psychologists and marketing practitioners and provide avenues for future research in the area.en
dc.format.extent26 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Consumer Psychologyen
dc.rights© 2017 Society for Consumer Psychology (Published by Elsevier). This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Journal of Consumer Psychology, Society for Consumer Psychology (Published by Elsevier). It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1002].en
dc.subjectHarmfulnessen
dc.subjectBrand Punishmenten
dc.subjectDRNTU::Business::Marketingen
dc.titleLie, cheat, and steal: how harmful brands motivate consumers to act unethicallyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolCollege of Business (Nanyang Business School)en
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jcpy.1002en
dc.description.versionAccepted versionen
dc.identifier.urlhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jcpy.1002en
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:NBS Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Rotman, Khamitov, and Connors (2018) Personal Copy.pdfMain article492.3 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 20

8
Updated on Sep 6, 2020

PublonsTM
Citations 20

8
Updated on Mar 4, 2021

Page view(s) 50

499
Updated on Aug 18, 2022

Download(s) 50

43
Updated on Aug 18, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.