Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88330
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChia, Wai-Munen_US
dc.contributor.authorJi, Xianbaien_US
dc.contributor.authorRana, Pradumna B.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLi, Chang Taien_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-19T06:59:18Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T17:00:53Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-19T06:59:18Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T17:00:53Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationJi, X., Rana, P. B., Chia, W.M., & Li, C. T. (2018). Trade Policy Options for Asean Countries and Their Regional Dialogue Partners: “Preference Ordering” Using CGE Analysis. (RSIS Working Paper, No. 308). Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/88330-
dc.description.abstractThe withdrawal of the United States (US) from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Trump’s “America First” agenda have ignited a second round of interest in mega-free trade agreements (mega-FTAs) in the Asia Pacific region. Countries have been motivated to explore alternative trade policy options. Using national real gross domestic output (GDP) gains estimated by the GTAP model to construct “preference ordering” for ten Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and their six regional dialogue partners, this paper comes up with several findings. First, when multilateral agreements are not possible, countries are better off with a narrower regional trading agreement than without one. Second, in the region, RCEP has higher beneficial impacts than the CPTPP. Third, for dual track countries, that is countries that are negotiating both the CPTPP and the RCEP, implementing both agreements is better than each separately. Fourth, as expected, economic impacts of the CPPTP are lower than those of the original TPP12, but all CPPTP members will benefit although to different degrees. Fifth, economic impacts of open regionalism are higher than those of a closed and reciprocal one. Going forward, the paper argues that ASEAN countries and their regional dialogue partners need to adopt a “multi-track, multi-stage” approach to trade policy.en_US
dc.format.extent35 p.en
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNanyang Technological Universityen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRSIS Working Papers, 308-18en_US
dc.rightsNanyang Technological Universityen_US
dc.subjectInternational Political Economyen_US
dc.subjectRegionalism and Multilateralismen_US
dc.titleTrade Policy Options for ASEAN Countries and Their Regional Dialogue Partners: “Preference Ordering” Using CGE Analysisen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextopen-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Working Papers
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP308.pdf718.93 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Page view(s) 50

384
Updated on Feb 28, 2021

Download(s) 5

686
Updated on Feb 28, 2021

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.