Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88332
Title: Revisiting the measurement of anomie
Authors: Teymoori, Ali
Jetten, Jolanda
Bastian, Brock
Ariyanto, Amarina
Autin, Frédérique
Ayub, Nadia
Badea, Constantina
Besta, Tomasz
Butera, Fabrizio
Costa-Lopes, Rui
Cui, Lijuan
Fantini, Carole
Finchilescu, Gillian
Gaertner, Lowell
Gollwitzer, Mario
Gómez, Ángel
González, Roberto
Hong, Ying Yi
Jensen, Dorthe Høj
Karasawa, Minoru
Kessler, Thomas
Klein, Olivier
Lima, Marcus
Mähönen, Tuuli Anna
Megevand, Laura
Morton, Thomas
Paladino, Paola
Polya, Tibor
Ruza, Aleksejs
Shahrazad, Wan
Sharma, Sushama
Torres, Ana Raquel
van der Bles, Anne Marthe
Wohl, Michael
Keywords: Anomie
DRNTU::Social sciences::Sociology
Socioeconomics
Issue Date: 2016
Source: Teymoori, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Ariyanto, A., Autin, F., Ayub, N., . . . Wohl, M. (2016). Revisiting the measurement of anomie. PLOS ONE, 11(7), e0158370-. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158370
Series/Report no.: PLOS ONE
Abstract: Sociologists coined the term “anomie” to describe societies that are characterized by disintegration and deregulation. Extending beyond conceptualizations of anomie that conflate the measurements of anomie as ‘a state of society’ and as a ‘state of mind’, we disentangle these conceptualizations and develop an analysis and measure of this phenomenon focusing on anomie as a perception of the ‘state of society’. We propose that anomie encompasses two dimensions: a perceived breakdown in social fabric (i.e., disintegration as lack of trust and erosion of moral standards) and a perceived breakdown in leadership (i.e., deregulation as lack of legitimacy and effectiveness of leadership). Across six studies we present evidence for the validity of the new measure, the Perception of Anomie Scale (PAS). Studies 1a and 1b provide evidence for the proposed factor structure and internal consistency of PAS. Studies 2a-c provide evidence of convergent and discriminant validity. Finally, assessing PAS in 28 countries, we show that PAS correlates with national indicators of societal functioning and that PAS predicts national identification and well-being (Studies 3a & 3b). The broader implications of the anomie construct for the study of group processes are discussed.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88332
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46908
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158370
Schools: Nanyang Business School 
Rights: This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:NBS Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Revisiting the Measurement of Anomie.pdf590.87 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 5

91
Updated on May 5, 2025

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 5

56
Updated on Oct 27, 2023

Page view(s)

464
Updated on May 5, 2025

Download(s) 20

225
Updated on May 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.