Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88477
Title: Mothers after gestational diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): a randomised controlled trial of a postnatal diabetes prevention program
Authors: O’Reilly, Sharleen L.
Dunbar, James A.
Versace, Vincent
Janus, Edward
Best, James D.
Carter, Rob
Oats, Jeremy J. N.
Skinner, Timothy
Ackland, Michael
Phillips, Paddy A.
Ebeling, Peter R.
Reynolds, John
Shih, Sophy T. F.
Hagger, Virginia
Coates, Michael
Wildey, Carol
Keywords: DRNTU::Science::Medicine
Cardiovascular Disease
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
Issue Date: 2016
Source: O’Reilly, S. L., Dunbar, J. A., Versace, V., Janus, E., Best, J. D., Carter, R., Oats, J. J. N., et al. (2016). Mothers after Gestational Diabetes in Australia (MAGDA): A Randomised Controlled Trial of a Postnatal Diabetes Prevention Program. PLOS Medicine, 13(7), e1002092-. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092
Series/Report no.: PLOS Medicine
Abstract: Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an increasingly prevalent risk factor for type 2 diabetes. We evaluated the effectiveness of a group-based lifestyle modification program in mothers with prior GDM within their first postnatal year. Methods and Findings: In this study, 573 women were randomised to either the intervention (n = 284) or usual care (n = 289). At baseline, 10% had impaired glucose tolerance and 2% impaired fasting glucose. The diabetes prevention intervention comprised one individual session, five group sessions, and two telephone sessions. Primary outcomes were changes in diabetes risk factors (weight, waist circumference, and fasting blood glucose), and secondary outcomes included achievement of lifestyle modification goals and changes in depression score and cardiovascular disease risk factors. The mean changes (intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis) over 12 mo were as follows: −0.23 kg body weight in intervention group (95% CI −0.89, 0.43) compared with +0.72 kg in usual care group (95% CI 0.09, 1.35) (change difference −0.95 kg, 95% CI −1.87, −0.04; group by treatment interaction p = 0.04); −2.24 cm waist measurement in intervention group (95% CI −3.01, −1.42) compared with −1.74 cm in usual care group (95% CI −2.52, −0.96) (change difference −0.50 cm, 95% CI −1.63, 0.63; group by treatment interaction p = 0.389); and +0.18 mmol/l fasting blood glucose in intervention group (95% CI 0.11, 0.24) compared with +0.22 mmol/l in usual care group (95% CI 0.16, 0.29) (change difference −0.05 mmol/l, 95% CI −0.14, 0.05; group by treatment interaction p = 0.331). Only 10% of women attended all sessions, 53% attended one individual and at least one group session, and 34% attended no sessions. Loss to follow-up was 27% and 21% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, primarily due to subsequent pregnancies. Study limitations include low exposure to the full intervention and glucose metabolism profiles being near normal at baseline. Conclusions: Although a 1-kg weight difference has the potential to be significant for reducing diabetes risk, the level of engagement during the first postnatal year was low. Further research is needed to improve engagement, including participant involvement in study design; it is potentially more effective to implement annual diabetes screening until women develop prediabetes before offering an intervention.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88477
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/46921
ISSN: 1549-1277
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002092
Schools: Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine (LKCMedicine) 
Rights: © 2016 O’Reilly et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:LKCMedicine Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 5

102
Updated on Mar 20, 2025

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 5

82
Updated on Oct 24, 2023

Page view(s)

376
Updated on Mar 26, 2025

Download(s) 50

89
Updated on Mar 26, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.