Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/88585
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSalman, Rinoen
dc.contributor.authorHill, Emma Maryen
dc.contributor.authorFeng, Lujiaen
dc.contributor.authorLindsey, Eric Ostromen
dc.contributor.authorMele Veedu, Deepaen
dc.contributor.authorBarbot, Sylvainen
dc.contributor.authorBanerjee, Parameshen
dc.contributor.authorHermawan, Iwanen
dc.contributor.authorNatawidjaja, Danny H.en
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-12T08:16:37Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T17:06:39Z-
dc.date.available2018-04-12T08:16:37Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T17:06:39Z-
dc.date.issued2017en
dc.identifier.citationSalman, R., Hill, E. M., Feng, L., Lindsey, E. O., Mele Veedu, D., Barbot, S., et al. (2017). Piecemeal Rupture of the Mentawai Patch, Sumatra: The 2008 Mw 7.2 North Pagai Earthquake Sequence. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 122(11), 9404-9419.en
dc.identifier.issn2169-9313en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/88585-
dc.description.abstractThe 25 February 2008 Mw 7.2 North Pagai earthquake partially ruptured the middle section of the Mentawai patch of the Sunda megathrust, offshore Sumatra. The patch has been forecast to generate a great earthquake in the next few decades. However, in the current cycle the patch has so far broken in a sequence of partial ruptures, one of which was the 2008 event, illustrating the potential of the patch to generate a spectrum of earthquake sizes. We estimate the coseismic slip distribution of the 2008 event by jointly inverting coseismic offsets from GPS and interferometric synthetic aperture radar. We then estimate afterslip with 5.6 years of cumulative GPS displacements. Our results suggest that the estimated afterslip partially overlaps the coseismic rupture. The overlap of coseismic rupture and afterslip can be explained conceptually by a simple rate‐and‐state model where the degree of overlapping is controlled by the dynamic weakening and the critical nucleation size in the velocity‐weakening area. Comparing our rate‐and‐state model results with our geodetic inversion results, we suggest that the part of the coseismic rupture that does not overlap with the afterslip may represent a velocity‐weakening region, while the overlapping part may represent a velocity‐strengthening region.en
dc.description.sponsorshipNRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore)en
dc.description.sponsorshipMOE (Min. of Education, S’pore)en
dc.format.extent16 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earthen
dc.rights© 2017 American Geophysical Union (AGU). This paper was published in Journal of Geophysical Research : Solid Earth and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of American Geophysical Union (AGU). The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014341]. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.en
dc.subject2008 Earthquakeen
dc.subjectAfterslipen
dc.titlePiecemeal Rupture of the Mentawai Patch, Sumatra : The 2008 Mw 7.2 North Pagai Earthquake Sequenceen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolAsian School of the Environmenten
dc.contributor.researchEarth Observatory of Singaporeen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2017JB014341en
dc.description.versionPublished versionen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:EOS Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Sep 2, 2020

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
checked on Sep 21, 2020

Page view(s)

223
checked on Sep 23, 2020

Download(s)

54
checked on Sep 23, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.