Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity following traumatic brain injury
Authors: Synnot, Anneliese
Chau, Marisa
Pitt, Veronica
O'Connor, Denise
Gruen, Russell Lindsay
Wasiak, Jason
Clavisi, Ornella
Pattuwage, Loyal
Phillips, Kate
Keywords: Baclofen
Botulinum Toxin A
Issue Date: 2017
Source: Synnot, A., Chau, M., Pitt, V., O'Connor, D., Gruen, R. L., Wasiak, J., . . . Phillips, K. Interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity following traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(11), CD008929-. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008929.pub2
Series/Report no.: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Abstract: Background: Skeletal muscle spasticity is a major physical complication resulting from traumatic brain injury (TBI), which can lead to muscle contracture, joint stiffness, reduced range of movement, broken skin and pain. Treatments for spasticity include a range of pharmacological and non‐pharmacological interventions, often used in combination. Management of spasticity following TBI varies from other clinical populations because of the added complexity of behavioural and cognitive issues associated with TBI. Objectives: To assess the effects of interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity in people with TBI. Search methods: In June 2017, we searched key databases including the Cochrane Injuries Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid) and others, in addition to clinical trials registries and the reference lists of included studies. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cross‐over RCTs evaluating any intervention for the management of spasticity in TBI. Only studies where at least 50% of participants had a TBI (or for whom separate data for participants with TBI were available) were included. The primary outcomes were spasticity and adverse effects. Secondary outcome measures were classified according to the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health including body functions (sensory, pain, neuromusculoskeletal and movement‐related functions) and activities and participation (general tasks and demands; mobility; self‐care; domestic life; major life areas; community, social and civic life). Data collection and analysis We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Data were synthesised narratively; meta‐analysis was precluded due to the paucity and heterogeneity of data. Main results: We included nine studies in this review which involved 134 participants with TBI. Only five studies reported between‐group differences, yielding outcome data for 105 participants with TBI. These five studies assessed the effects of a range of pharmacological (baclofen, botulinum toxin A) and non‐pharmacological (casting, physiotherapy, splints, tilt table standing and electrical stimulation) interventions, often in combination. The studies which tested the effect of baclofen and tizanidine did not report their results adequately. Where outcome data were available, spasticity and adverse events were reported, in addition to some secondary outcome measures. Of the five studies with results, three were funded by governments, charities or health services and two were funded by a pharmaceutical or medical technology company. The four studies without useable results were funded by pharmaceutical or medical technology companies. It was difficult to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of these interventions due to poor reporting, small study size and the fact that participants with TBI were usually only a proportion of the overall total. Meta‐analysis was not feasible due to the paucity of data and heterogeneity of interventions and comparator groups. Some studies concluded that the intervention they tested had beneficial effects on spasticity, and others found no difference between certain treatments. The most common adverse event was minor skin damage in people who received casting. We believe it would be misleading to provide any further description of study results given the quality of the evidence was very low for all outcomes. Authors' conclusions: The very low quality and limited amount of evidence about the management of spasticity in people with TBI means that we are uncertain about the effectiveness or harms of these interventions. Well‐designed and adequately powered studies using functional outcome measures to test the interventions used in clinical practice are needed.
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008929.pub2
Rights: © 2017 The Cochrane Collaboration (Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.). This paper was published in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and is made available as an electronic reprint (preprint) with permission of The Cochrane Collaboration (Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.). The published version is available at: []. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic or multiple reproduction, distribution to multiple locations via electronic or other means, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper is prohibited and is subject to penalties under law.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:LKCMedicine Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity following traumatic brain injury.pdf946.44 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail

Google ScholarTM




Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.