Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91669
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHong, Lysaen
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-20T04:44:43Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T18:09:55Z-
dc.date.available2011-01-20T04:44:43Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T18:09:55Z-
dc.date.copyright2010en
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifier.citationHong, L. (2010). Rejoinder on ‘alternative narratives : the danger of romanticising the other’. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 117). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/91669-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/6671en
dc.description.abstractWOULD like to respond to the RSIS Commentary (113/2010) on Alternatives Narratives: The Danger of Romanticising the Other by Ong Wei Chong published on 14 September 2010. This is to clarify what it is that academic historians do. There are certain misconceptions about this on the part of the public. This arises from the blurring of lines between the writing of history as an academic practice, and the general usage of the word to mean writing about the past, which anyone who has something he or she wants to say can do, and to good effect.en
dc.format.extent2 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRSIS Commentaries ; 117/10en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::General::Historyen
dc.titleRejoinder on ‘alternative narratives : the danger of romanticising the other’en
dc.typeCommentaryen
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Commentaries
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RSIS1172010.pdf133.36 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.