Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/91697
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOng, Wei Chongen
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-20T03:02:48Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T18:10:21Z-
dc.date.available2011-01-20T03:02:48Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T18:10:21Z-
dc.date.copyright2010en
dc.date.issued2010en
dc.identifier.citationOng, W. C. (2010). Alternative narratives : why i wrote it. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 118). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/91697-
dc.description.abstractIN RESPONSE to Hong Lysa’s remarks on my RSIS Commentary on Alternative Narratives: The Danger of Romanticising the Other published on 14 September, I would like to clarify three issues of contention: history as a practice; the writing of alternative narratives; and the crux of her argument. At no point did my article suggest that any Singapore-based academics were engaged in the romanticisation of violent revolutionaries. My commentary was premised not on any unfounded innuendos but on the perils of romanticising the exploits of violent revolutionaries that threatened the security of Malaysia and Singapore from 1968 to 1989.en
dc.format.extent2 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRSIS Commentaries ; 118/10en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciencesen
dc.titleAlternative narratives : why i wrote iten
dc.typeCommentaryen
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Commentaries
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
RSIS1182010.pdf121.66 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.