Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/94422
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMills, Gregen
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-12T06:51:22Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T18:55:44Z-
dc.date.available2015-08-12T06:51:22Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T18:55:44Z-
dc.date.copyright2014en
dc.date.issued2014en
dc.identifier.citationMills, G. (2014). Why states fail & how states recover. (RSIS Commentaries, No. 193). RSIS Commentaries. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/94422-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/38441en
dc.description.abstractSomalia and its twin Somaliland are prototypes of states that fail and states that recover. The difference between Somalia and Somaliland is the difference between a peace owned and a rent-seeking peace. Local ownership is but one aspect of the conditions for state recovery.en
dc.format.extent3 p.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRSIS Commentaries 193-14en
dc.rightsNanyang Technological Universityen
dc.subjectDRNTU::Social sciences::Political scienceen
dc.titleWhy states fail & how states recoveren
dc.typeCommentaryen
dc.contributor.schoolS. Rajaratnam School of International Studiesen
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:RSIS Commentaries
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CO14193.pdf383.72 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open

Google ScholarTM

Check

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.