Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites||Authors:||Krainer, Adrian R.
|Keywords:||DRNTU::Science::Biological sciences||Issue Date:||2003||Source:||Roca, X., Sachidanandam R., & Krainer A. R. (2003). Intrinsic differences between authentic and cryptic 5' splice sites. Nucleic Acids Research, 31(21), 6321-6333.||Series/Report no.:||Nucleic acids research||Abstract:||Cryptic splice sites are used only when use of a natural splice site is disrupted by mutation. To determine the features that distinguish authentic from cryptic 5′ splice sites (5′ss), we systematically analyzed a set of 76 cryptic 5′ss derived from 46 human genes. These cryptic 5′ss have a similar frequency distribution in exons and introns, and are usually located close to the authentic 5′ss. Statistical analysis of the strengths of the 5′ss using the Shapiro and Senapathy matrix revealed that authentic 5′ss have significantly higher score values than cryptic 5′ss, which in turn have higher values than the mutant ones. β‐Globin provides an interesting exception to this rule, so we chose it for detailed experimental analysis in vitro. We found that the sequences of the β‐globin authentic and cryptic 5′ss, but not their surrounding context, determine the correct 5′ss choice, although their respective scores do not reflect this functional difference. Our analysis provides a statistical basis to explain the competitive advantage of authentic over cryptic 5′ss in most cases, and should facilitate the development of tools to reliably predict the effect of disease‐associated 5′ss‐disrupting mutations at the mRNA level.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/95535
|ISSN:||1362-4962||DOI:||10.1093/nar/gkg830||Rights:||© 2003 Oxford University Press. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Nucleic Acids Research, Oxford University Press. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkg830].||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||SBS Journal Articles|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.