Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Design for process flexibility : efficiency of the long chain and sparse structure||Authors:||Chou, Mabel C.
Chua, Geoffrey A.
|Keywords:||DRNTU::Business::Operations management::Supply chain management||Issue Date:||2010||Source:||Chou, M. C., Chua, G. A., Teo, C.-P., & Zheng, H. (2010). Design for process flexibility : efficiency of the long chain and sparse structure. Operations research, 58(1), 43-58.||Series/Report no.:||Operations research||Abstract:||The concept of chaining, or in more general terms, sparse process structure, has been extremely influential in the process flexibility area, with many large automakers already making this the cornerstone of their business strategies to remain competitive in the industry. The effectiveness of the process strategy, using chains or other sparse structures, has been validated in numerous empirical studies. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been relatively few concrete analytical results on the performance of such strategies vis-á-vis the full flexibility system, especially when the system size is large or when the demand and supply are asymmetrical. This paper is an attempt to bridge this gap. We study the problem from two angles: (1) For the symmetrical system where the (mean) demand and plant capacity are balanced and identical, we utilize the concept of a generalized random walk to evaluate the asymptotic performance of the chaining structure in this environment. We show that a simple chaining structure performs surprisingly well for a variety of realistic demand distributions, even when the system size is large. (2) For the more general problem, we identify a class of conditions under which only a sparse flexible structure is needed so that the expected performance is already within ϵ optimality of the full flexibility system. Our approach provides a theoretical justification for the widely held maxim: In many practical situations, adding a small number of links to the process flexibility structure can significantly enhance the ability of the system to match (fixed) production capacity with (random) demand.||URI:||https://hdl.handle.net/10356/95868
|DOI:||10.1287/opre.1080.0664||Rights:||© 2010 INFORMS. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Operations Research, INFORMS. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.1080.0664].||Fulltext Permission:||open||Fulltext Availability:||With Fulltext|
|Appears in Collections:||NBS Journal Articles|
Files in This Item:
|Chou et al. (2010) Design for Process Flexibility.pdf||321.37 kB||Adobe PDF|
Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.