Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/96296
Title: Comparison of HIV-1 genotypic resistance test interpretation systems in predicting virological outcomes over time
Authors: Frentz, Dineke
Assel, Matthias
De Luca, Andrea
Fabbiani, Massimiliano
Incardona, Francesca
Libin, Pieter
Manca, Nino
Müller, Viktor
Paredes, Roger
Quiros-Roldan, Eugenia
Ruiz, Lidia
Torti, Carlo
Vandamme, Anne-Mieke
Van Laethem, Kristel
Zazzi, Maurizio
Boucher, Charles A. B.
Prosperi, Mattia C. F.
Sloot, Peter M. A.
van de Vijver, David A. M. C.
Nuallain, Breanndan O.
Keywords: DRNTU::Engineering::Computer science and engineering::Computer applications::Life and medical sciences
Issue Date: 2010
Source: Frentz, D., Boucher, C. A. B., Assel, M., De Luca, A., Fabbiani, M., Incardona, F., et al. (2010). Comparison of HIV-1 Genotypic Resistance Test Interpretation Systems in Predicting Virological Outcomes Over Time. PLoS ONE, 5(7), e11505.
Series/Report no.: PLoS ONE
Abstract: Several decision support systems have been developed to interpret HIV-1 drug resistance genotyping results. This study compares the ability of the most commonly used systems (ANRS, Rega, and Stanford's HIVdb) to predict virological outcome at 12, 24, and 48 weeks. Methodology/Principal Findings Included were 3763 treatment-change episodes (TCEs) for which a HIV-1 genotype was available at the time of changing treatment with at least one follow-up viral load measurement. Genotypic susceptibility scores for the active regimens were calculated using scores defined by each interpretation system. Using logistic regression, we determined the association between the genotypic susceptibility score and proportion of TCEs having an undetectable viral load (<50 copies/ml) at 12 (8–16) weeks (2152 TCEs), 24 (16–32) weeks (2570 TCEs), and 48 (44–52) weeks (1083 TCEs). The Area under the ROC curve was calculated using a 10-fold cross-validation to compare the different interpretation systems regarding the sensitivity and specificity for predicting undetectable viral load. The mean genotypic susceptibility score of the systems was slightly smaller for HIVdb, with 1.92±1.17, compared to Rega and ANRS, with 2.22±1.09 and 2.23±1.05, respectively. However, similar odds ratio's were found for the association between each-unit increase in genotypic susceptibility score and undetectable viral load at week 12; 1.6 [95% confidence interval 1.5–1.7] for HIVdb, 1.7 [1.5–1.8] for ANRS, and 1.7 [1.9–1.6] for Rega. Odds ratio's increased over time, but remained comparable (odds ratio's ranging between 1.9–2.1 at 24 weeks and 1.9–2.2 at 48 weeks). The Area under the curve of the ROC did not differ between the systems at all time points; p = 0.60 at week 12, p = 0.71 at week 24, and p = 0.97 at week 48. Conclusions/Significance Three commonly used HIV drug resistance interpretation systems ANRS, Rega and HIVdb predict virological response at 12, 24, and 48 weeks, after change of treatment to the same extent.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/96296
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/9871
ISSN: 1932-6203
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011505
Schools: School of Computer Engineering 
Rights: © 2010 Frentz et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Fulltext Permission: open
Fulltext Availability: With Fulltext
Appears in Collections:SCSE Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 10

53
Updated on May 1, 2025

Web of ScienceTM
Citations 5

50
Updated on Oct 25, 2023

Page view(s) 10

870
Updated on May 5, 2025

Download(s) 20

331
Updated on May 5, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.