Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/97007
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan, Kang Haien
dc.contributor.authorYang, Boen
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-17T03:09:54Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T19:37:50Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-17T03:09:54Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T19:37:50Z-
dc.date.copyright2011en
dc.date.issued2011en
dc.identifier.citationYang, B., & Tan, K. H. (2012). Numerical analyses of steel beam–column joints subjected to catenary action. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 70, 1-11.en
dc.identifier.issn0143-974Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/97007-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the numerical results of 6 beam–column joint tests using six types of connections: web cleat, fin plate, top and seat with web angles (TSWA) (8 mm thick angle), flush end plate, extended end plate, and TSWA (12 mm thick angle). Both static and explicit dynamic solvers were employed to overcome the problems of convergence, contact, large deformation and fracture simulations. The finite element models were validated against the test results. It is demonstrated that the finite element analyses give reasonable accuracy compared to the test results. The simulation results indicate that a static solver could predict more accurate simulation results than an explicit dynamic solver. But the problem of numerical non-convergence usually occurs when the static solver is employed to conduct fracture simulations. Complete fracture simulations could only be conducted by the explicit dynamic solver although huge computation resources are required for complicated joint models. In addition, an extensive parametric study was undertaken using these validated models to obtain the rotation capacities of various types of connections under catenary action. Finally, some practical design implications have been drawn up from the parametric study and four new connection acceptance criteria of rotation capacities have been proposed to consider catenary action under a middle column removal scenario. The work shows that current acceptance criteria of rotation capacities for steel joints such as web cleat, fin plate, flush end plate and TSWA connections, are probably too conservative as they only consider pure flexural resistance.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of constructional steel researchen
dc.rights© 2011 Elsevier Ltd.en
dc.titleNumerical analyses of steel beam–column joints subjected to catenary actionen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineeringen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.007en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:CEE Journal Articles

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 5

121
Updated on Dec 28, 2021

PublonsTM
Citations 5

84
Updated on Mar 7, 2021

Page view(s) 20

602
Updated on May 18, 2022

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Plumx

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.