Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10356/97844
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGupta, A.en
dc.contributor.authorTang, P. S.en
dc.contributor.authorJena, Rajeeb Kumaren
dc.contributor.authorYue, Chee Yoonen
dc.contributor.authorLam, Yee Cheongen
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-24T04:14:05Zen
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-06T19:47:18Z-
dc.date.available2013-07-24T04:14:05Zen
dc.date.available2019-12-06T19:47:18Z-
dc.date.copyright2012en
dc.date.issued2012en
dc.identifier.citationJena, R. K., Yue, C. Y., Lam, Y. C., Tang, P. S., & Gupta, A. (2012). Comparison of different molds (epoxy, polymer and silicon) for microfabrication by hot embossing technique. Sensors and actuators B : chemical, 163(1), 233-241.en
dc.identifier.issn0925-4005en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10356/97844-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10220/12099en
dc.description.abstractIn the fabrication of microfluidic devices by hot embossing, secondary molds made from epoxy and other polymeric materials with high Tg are commonly used in lab-scale research and for short production runs of several hundred products. However, few studies have been conducted to compare the performance and efficacy of such molds compared to the master silicon mold. To allow such molds to be exploited fully, this study investigates the performance of silicon, epoxy and COC (TOPAS-6017 grade) molds to fabricate microchannels on COC (TOPAS-8007 grade) substrate using hot embossing. The degree of filling of the mold cavity during microfabrication was assessed. At the optimum embossing conditions (i.e. 100 °C, 2.94 kN load and 5 min loading time), all three molds had similar performance in terms of replication fidelity. However, at sub-optimum conditions (e.g. 80 °C), the silicon mold was the best in terms of mold cavity filling followed by COC and epoxy. For surface roughness and friction coefficient which are important factors affecting tool life, it was found that epoxy mold gives the lowest values followed by COC and silicon. The surface energy determined using contact angle measurements gave a similar trend with epoxy having the lowest surface energy (28 dyne/cm), followed by COC (33.52 dyne/cm) and silicon (71.63 dynedyne/cm). A lower surface energy will result in lower adhesion and friction coefficient between the polymer and mold, resulting in easier demolding.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSensors and actuators B : chemicalen
dc.rights© 2012 Elsevier B.V.en
dc.subjectDRNTU::Engineering::Mechanical engineeringen
dc.titleComparison of different molds (epoxy, polymer and silicon) for microfabrication by hot embossing techniqueen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineeringen
dc.contributor.researchSingapore-MIT Alliance Programmeen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.snb.2012.01.043en
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:MAE Journal Articles

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Items in DR-NTU are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.